You must register on Tobacco Free Nova Scotia to gain access to the Support Forums. All content published in the Support Forums is publicly accessible.

You agree that you will not upload or publish any communications or content of any type that infringe or violate any rights of any person. By submitting a post to this support forum, you agree that it is non-confidential for all purposes and agree that Tobacco Nova Scotia may use, reproduce, publish or translate and display the communication in any format. Nova Scotia and/or its service provider will not edit comments but do reserve the right to review and delete inappropriate or offensive comments and materials. Comments and materials that violate Canadian law may be deleted or disclosed depending on their nature. The opinions expressed by those providing comments do not reflect the opinions of Nova Scotia and/or its service provider. The comment section is not intended as, and is not, a substitute for professional medical advice. All decisions about clinical care should be made in consultation with your treating healthcare provider.

Forum Navigation
You need to log in to create posts and topics.

What are your views on harm reduction?

Tobacco harm reduction (THR) is a public health strategy to lower the health risks associated with using nicotine, as an example of the concept of harm reduction, a strategy for dealing with the abuse of other drugs. Smokingtobacco is widely acknowledged as a leading cause of illness and death.[1]
However, nicotine itself is not very harmful, as inferred from the long
history of use for nicotine replacement therapy products.[2]
Thus, THR measures have been focused on reducing or eliminating the use
of combustible tobacco by switching to other nicotine products, including:

  1. Cutting down (either long-term or before quitting smoking)
  2. Temporary abstinence
  3. Switching to non-tobacco nicotine containing products, such as pharmaceutical nicotine replacement therapies or products such as electronic cigarettes ( more favorably called PV’s or personal vaporizer).
  4. Switching to smokeless tobacco products such as Swedishsnus
  5. Switching to non-combustible organic or additive-free tobacco products

It is widely acknowledged that discontinuation of all tobacco
products confers the greatest lowering of risk. However, approved
smoking cessation methods have a 90% failure rate, when used as
directed.[1] In addition, there is a considerable population of smokers who are unable or unwilling to achieve abstinence.[3] Harm reduction is likely of substantial benefit to these smokers and public health.[1][2]
Providing reduced-harm alternatives to smokers is certain to result in
lower total population risk than pursuing abstinence-only policies.[4]The strategy is controversial: proponents of tobacco harm reduction
assert that lessening the health risk for the individual user is
worthwhile and manifests over the population in fewer tobacco-related
illnesses and deaths.[3][5] Opponents argue that some aspects of harm reduction interfere with cessation and abstinence and might increase initiation.  Source: Wikipedia

We believe based upon  recent clinical studies, research and
interventions by professional Tobacco Control Specialist
, that the
over-all benefit to human suffering demands those opposing THR
re-consider their motivation for opposing less harmful products. We
further believe modern technology be utilized to significantly decrease
such harms to smokers and that promotion of personal vaporizers PV’s or
ENDS ( electronic nicotine deliver systems ) as they are referred to by
opponents; be considered as a ” primary ” tool for smokers seeking to
end their smoking addiction.

Board of Directors  THRA  –  Tobacco Harm Reduction Association of Canada